Page 1 of 2
Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:11 am
by Fredline
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:43 am
by Lea Dweller
I am surprised you don't know John, it is almost certainly from Bob Southwell!
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:55 am
by Old Man River
I have a very similar 10ft Mk IV glass rod to yours Fredline, same coloured glass, same weave, exactly the same ferrules, but possibly a bit slimmer. It has a bit of steel tube right at the end of the butt section, but I cannot tell if it goes into glass or a wooden butt piece as it is underneath the cork and I dont want to mess with it as it is fine.
The rod in fact has a very nice action , maybe the steel section was inserted as a counter balance ?
I have asked around but nobody really has a clue as to the identity .
OMR
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:59 am
by Fredline
Lea Dweller wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:43 am
I am surprised you don't know John, it is almost certainly from Bob Southwell!
Of course Ted, how could I have missed it, a Southwell glass blank and Kenny Kendal fittings. Solved.
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 11:28 am
by Wallys-Cast
I have seen loads of glass rods with alloy tubes under the handle cork and a few with whole cane under the handle cork but built cane is a new one on me.
John, I think yours is probably a Kenny Southwell prototype.
Wal.
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 11:54 am
by Lea Dweller
Wallys-Cast wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 11:28 am
I have seen loads of glass rods with alloy tubes under the handle cork and a few with whole cane under the handle cork but built cane is a new one on me.
John, I think yours is probably a Kenny Southwell prototype.
Wal.
Well done Wal, I thought exactly the same, good job some of us are clued up!
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:16 pm
by Olly
Looking at the tip ring and the shrink-tube - it is homemade bitsa! The tip ring possibly coming from the split cane rod!
I had a pike rod where the hollow alloy tube for the handle bent through 90 deg casting a mackerel lump! Cane won't do that.
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:32 pm
by Fredline
For a home made "bitsa" they did not scrimp on the fittings. I sold the rings for£50. They were quality.
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 1:03 pm
by Lea Dweller
Fredline wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:32 pm
For a home made "bitsa" they did not scrimp on the fittings. I sold the rings for£50. They were quality.
Evidently Southwell/Kendal rod rings were made by appointment to the Queen's jeweller!
Re: Not a Chapmans rod.
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:26 pm
by Wagtail
Would the bag take a 500..... and if so is it for sale?